You Can Act Up the Case Let Her Cry

February 16, 2022 Post a Comment

CASE STUDY: Hashemite kingdom of jordan Cheyenne and the Ideals of Family Youtubers

Example Study PDF | Additional Case Studies

On September viii, 2021, Jordan Cheyenne, a family unit YouTuber with over 500,000 subscribers, posted a video on her channel titled "We are heartbroken." In the video, she explained that her son'south new puppy had contracted Parvo, a highly contagious virus with a high bloodshed charge per unit, and the family was terrified that the dog would not live for very long. While the video was relatively normal in the beginning, the finish included a clip that Cheyenne seemed to forget to edit out, which shows her coaching her 9-twelvemonth-old son on how to pose for a thumbnail image (the small image displayed on YouTube before you click on the video). "Deed like you lot're crying," Cheyenne told him. Obviously upset, he responded with "Mom, I'm really crying." Viewers were outraged at Cheyenne's beliefs and the video speedily circulated on social media platforms. Soon the video, Cheyenne'southward unabridged YouTube channel, and her Instagram account were all deleted. The state of affairs has re-ignited a long-continuing debate about the ethics of family vloggers.

On ane hand, there are many criticisms of family YouTubers. Perhaps one of the nearly common critiques is that the parents (who run the vlogging channels) are profiting off their children. Some debate that the children in these families –sometimes called "kidfluencers"– should exist held to the same standards equally child actors and therefore be protected by child labor laws (H., 2020). These laws require that a certain percent of the kid's earnings exist put into a protected banking company account; they also plant labor guidelines that include obtaining a permit for a child to work, limits on work hours, a mandate for "rest and recreation" time, and a requirement that the kid's work not interfere with their education (H., 2020). Because these guidelines do not utilise to social media, they do not use to children included in the videos posted on these family YouTube channels. Thus, these children are unprotected from the possibility of exploitation.

Another attribute of family channels brought up past critics is the topic of consent. Many channels post videos of parents having conversations with their children about individual subjects. For case, a channel chosen 8 Passengers documented a chat between a female parent and her immature daughter discussing puberty. Even if a child does consent to existence on photographic camera, how meaningful can it be coming from someone who does not fully empathize the present or time to come implications of such an deed while being encouraged (or pressured) by their parent? Furthermore, critics point out that many of these channels accept dysfunctional families behind the scenes. For instance, the ACE Family YouTube channel accidentally left a prune in a video posted in October of 2022 which shows the father, Austin McBroom, swearing at his wife in front of their children (Ward, 2020). Similarly, Myka Stauffer, a family YouTuber with over ane million subscribers, posted a video in May 2022 explaining that she and her husband had to "re-dwelling house" their autistic 2-year-old son who they had recently adopted from China (Sisley, 2020).

On the other hand, fans of family unit YouTube channels merits that while there are some bad apples, the majority of these channels are harmless. Prank videos, craft, toy reviews, and daily vlogs are typically just surface-level amusement that are fun for both the family unit and their subscribers (Ward, 2020). Importantly, family channels can also be a good resources for viewers that may exist considering having children themselves. For first-time parents or showtime-fourth dimension adopters, these vlogs offer useful advice from people who have clear experience in parenting and childcare.

Moreover, YouTube channels can also be a valuable source of income for families (Suha, 2020). As these vlogs have go more than pop in contempo years, in some cases raking in millions of views, they have allowed for the virtually pop channels to make a good profit from their content. In terms of a chore, running a family channel isn't a bad fashion to earn a living; you lot can set your ain hours, include your family unit in your piece of work, work from home, and yous don't have to answer to a boss (Suha, 2020). Indeed, household direction and caring for children are expensive, so if parents are already having fun filming their families' activities and memories, why not upload information technology for others to enjoy and earn some income at the same fourth dimension?

Despite the potential advantages that family unit vlogs offer, critics maintain that these points only increase the stakes for potential harm. Indeed, the fact that many new parents may look to channels similar Cheyenne's and use them every bit a model for parenting is exactly why more and more people are coming out against family vlogs. Notwithstanding, for every problematic channel like Jordan Cheyenne's, at that place are plenty of other truly wholesome accounts. Should these channels exist punished for the actions of others? With the popularity of the genre growing so rapidly, and with other stories like Cheyenne's continuing to surface, we will continue to exist faced with important questions about our responsibility to children working on social media.

Discussion Questions:

Should a government entity be in command of protecting children on family unit channels through legislation, or should that responsibility be left to YouTube or to parents?
Do you call up children have the ability to consent to being on camera and their image being published on the net? At what age exercise you remember that consent can be given?
How are the ethical concerns of children on family YouTube channels different from kids posting content on their ain social media channels?
Should YouTube demonetize family YouTube channels altogether? If YouTube were to demonetize family vlogs, practise you think the genre would nonetheless prosper?
Is information technology ethical to watch family unit vlogs? What nigh vlogs that include questionable parenting? What are the upstanding duties of the viewers of family vlogs?

Further Information:

Elfer, H. (2021, September 15). "YouTuber Deletes Aqueduct After Being Caught Coaching Her Son to Cry on Camera Over Their Sick Dog." The Independent. Available at: https://world wide web.contained.co.uk/news/world/americas/youtube-jordan-cheyenne-coaching-son-b1920178.html

H., Carlota. (2020, June 12). "The Ethics of Family unit Vlogging." Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/a-parent-is-built-in/the-ethics-of-family-vlogging-cd75b734f2f6

Sisley, G. (2020, May 29). "This YouTuber Rehomed Her Autistic, Adopted Son of ii Years." Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/fearless-she-wrote/this-youtuber-rehomed-her-autistic-adoptive-son-of-two-years-955abd4af5aa

Suha, S. A. (2020, Feb 5). "The Case of Family Vloggers." The Daily Star. Bachelor at: https://www.thedailystar.net/shout/news/the-instance-family-vloggers-1864195

Ward, K. (2020, November 6). "Examining the Ethics of Family Vlogging." The Journal. Available at: https://www.queensjournal.ca/story/2020-11-06/pop-civilisation/examining-the-ethics-of-family unit-vlogging/

Authors:

Claire Coburn, Jamie Jelinek, & Kat Williams
Media Ethics Initiative
Center for Media Date
University of Texas at Austin
Feb 1, 2022

YouTube screen capture from The Independent / Modified

This case was supported by funding from the John S. and James Fifty. Knight Foundation. These cases tin be used in unmodified PDF form in classroom or educational settings. For use in publications such equally textbooks, readers, and other works, please contact the Center for Media Engagement.

peytonanympalee.blogspot.com

Source: https://mediaengagement.org/research/act-like-youre-crying/